ABSTRACT
Background: The Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon began a Mobile Medication Unit (MMU) as part of their Great Circle Recovery Opioid Treatment Program (OTP) to address elevated rates of opioid use disorder (OUD) among American Indians and Alaska Natives in Oregon. The MMU provides methadone or buprenorphine for individuals with OUD, enrolled in the OTP, who are living either on the reservation or in surrounding rural communities. An implementation study describes the service through document review and qualitatively assesses patient and staff experiences and the perceived barriers and facilitators to mobile services.
Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews with patients (n=11), MMU staff (n=5), and the state opioid treatment authority (n=1) gathered details on the initiative’s development and operations. Provider interviews probed implementation experiences. Patient interviews focused on their experiences with the MMU and staff, changes in quality of life and recommendations for enhancing treatment. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using a Thematic Analysis approach.
Results: Staff themes identified two driving forces (i.e. staff desire for an inclusive approach to wellness that is accessible to all community members; the catalysts for the MMU), two steps toward MMU development (i.e. Tribal approvals and support; the construction and maintenance of community relationships) and two perspectives on MMU implementation and impact (i.e. initial implementation barriers; facilitators and observations of how the MMU reduced stigma associated with agonist therapy). Patients’ themes noted the MMU’s professional and ‘caring’ environment, accessible rural locations and general suggestions including culturally responsive ancillary services.
Conclusion: The Great Circle MMU enhanced access to opioid agonist therapy for people with OUD (i.e. American Indians/Alaska Natives, and non-natives) living in rural communities. The Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde operates the first Tribally owned OTP MMU, grounded in cultural humility and committed to Tribal members and the great circle of the larger community.
MOUD
Implementation of medication for opioid use disorder treatment in Indian health clinics in California: A qualitative evaluation
Abstract
Introduction: American Indians and Alaska Native (AIAN) populations are disproportionately affected by opioid misuse. Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is essential to decrease overdose events and overdose deaths. AIAN communities can benefit from MOUD programs that are housed within primary care clinics to improve treatment accessibility. This study aimed to gather information on the needs, barriers, and successes related to implementing MOUD programs in Indian health clinics (IHCs) offering primary care.
Methods: The study used the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance Qualitative Evaluation for Systematic Translation (RE-AIM QuEST) evaluation framework to structure key informant interviews with clinic staff who received technical assistance for MOUD program implementation. The study incorporated RE-AIM dimensions into a semi-structured interview guide. We developed the coding approach for analyzing interview data using Braun and Clarke’s (2006) reflexive thematic analysis in qualitative research.
Results: Eleven clinics participated in the study. The research team conducted twenty-nine interviews with clinic staff. We found that inadequate education about MOUD, scant resources, and limited availability of AIAN providers adversely impacted reach. Challenges with integrating medical and behavioral care, patient-level barriers (e.g., rural conditions, geographical dispersion), and limited workforce capacity impacted MOUD effectiveness. Stigma at the clinic level was detrimental to MOUD adoption. Implementation was challenging due to a limited number of waivered providers, and the need for technical assistance and MOUD policies and procedures. Staff turnover and restricted physical infrastructure negatively influenced MOUD maintenance.
Conclusions: Clinical infrastructure should be strengthened. The integration of culture into clinic services must be embraced by staff to support MOUD adoption. Increased representation from AIAN clinical staff is needed to appropriately represent the population being served. Stigma at various levels must be addressed, and the multiple barriers that AIAN communities face must be considered in understanding MOUD program implementation and outcomes.
Community members and students may request access to this article by completing the form here.
A cross-sectional study of differences in medication for opioid use disorder receipt among pregnant people enrolled in Medicaid in Oregon, United States
Abstract
Background and Aims
Medication is the gold standard to support a healthy pregnancy for pregnant people with opioid use disorder (OUD). This study measured inequities and differences in OUD medication treatment among pregnant people in Oregon, USA.
Design, Setting, Participants and Measurements
Our study population consisted of Medicaid enrollees across the US state of Oregon who had at least one live hospital birth between 2012 and 2020 and one diagnosis of OUD prenatally (n = 4363). We measured differences in demographic characteristics (age, race, ethnicity, location) among those with and without medication for OUD in the prenatal through 3-months postpartum period (any medication use, and by type), and compared exclusive methadone versus buprenorphine receipt. We report unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios.
Findings
Adjusted odds ratios for medication for OUD were lower among American Indian/Alaska Native pregnant people compared with White pregnant people [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.42, 0.83)], younger pregnant people compared with those aged 30–34 years [aOR, ages 15–19: 0.1 (95 CI = 0.06, 0.18); aOR, ages 20–24: 0.58 (95 CI = 0.49, 0.69)] and rural pregnant people compared with those in urban communities [aOR 0.58 (95 CI = 0.5–0.67)]. Rural pregnant people with OUD also had lower odds of methadone receipt [aOR 0.23 (95 CI = 0.17, 0.3)] and higher odds of buprenorphine receipt [aOR 3.99 (95 CI = 2.97, 5.35)] than other people in this study. Among those who received medication, Black pregnant people had increased odds of receiving methadone compared with buprenorphine [aOR 2.09 (95 CI = 1.1–3.97)].
Conclusions
In Oregon, USA, inequities in receipt of any medication for opioid use disorder were observed among pregnant people who identified as American Indian or Alaska Native, younger than 25, and living in rural communities. Black pregnant people in Oregon, USA, were more likely to receive methadone than buprenorphine.
Narrative Review of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Changes During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Their Impact on American Indian/Alaska Native Communities
ABSTRACT
Background: The United States (US) declared drug overdose a public health emergency in 2017. Despite this, two million people reported having an opioid use disorder (OUD) in 2018. However, following the beginning of COVID-19 there was a 53% increase in overdose deaths, with American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) individuals experiencing the highest rates of all racial groups. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and OUD treatment access challenges, OUD treatment policies were changed to improving access to care. Purpose: This review examines how the state- and federal-level policies impacted access to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the devastating impact of overdose and COVID-19 on AI/AN communities, as a secondary aim, we examined the inclusion of these populations in the samples of the included studies. Methods: We completed a narrative review using a data-based convergent synthesis design. Results: Forty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies were quantitative descriptive studies (n =25). Only two studies offer AI/AN as a category for ethnicity and both had less that 4% of the sample that identified as an AI/AN individual. Conclusion and Implications: Telehealth OUD treatment increased initiation and retention for patients taking buprenorphine. No increase in overdose rates was associated with allowing for additional take-home doses of methadone. However, access to treatment, even telehealth, remains difficult for individuals due to a lack of OUD treatment providers and access to the internet. More needs to be done to address the opioid overdose crisis, especially among AI/AN communities. Research focused on cultural strategies to address this health disparity is desperately needed. We included nursing implications in response to this health disparity among AI/AN individuals.